Saturday, July 24, 2010

Large Law Firms in Australia and Twitter

I saw a retweet from @hollingsworth this week.

"RT @kcarruthers: who do you think has best use of social media by legal firm in Oz? /cc @mysocialpolicy @radhikar @ Rachael Falk (Telstra)"

Naturally, I responded by pointing toward @nortonrose_au. I was the Communications Manager for Norton Rose Australia from 2008-2010 and drove the firm's on-line activities.

But it got me thinking, unless you're in the legal industry you may not know who the largest law firms in Australia are.

So I thought I'd go back and look at what those firms have been doing since the concept first appeared on their collective radars last year (see The New Laywer and Lawyers Weekly stories).

For now, I've chosen to focus on Twitter.

Both the Australian Financial Review and The Australian publish twice yearly surveys of the largest firms in the country. Since the AFR's is behind a paywall and invisible to the Web, I'll use The Australian's and select the ten largest firms by revenue.

Firm
Twitter ID
Tweets
Followers
Listed
Allens Arthur Robinson
592
475
34
Baker & McKenzie
48
80
7
Blake Dawson
16
301
30
Clayton Utz
163
182
24
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
186
387
35
DLA Phillips Fox
35
230
23
Freehills
53
145
17
Malleson Stephen Jacques
107
318
27
Minter Ellison
138
182
19
Norton Rose
786
1078
56

You'll find a list of these firms on Norton Rose Australia's page.

Of course, this is just a list of the firm's Twitter accounts, not those of their partners and lawyers. But I'd argue it's a good indicator of the partnerships' overall participation in Web 2.0.

And, as we know, Twitter is not all there is to social media. A more detailed comparison should also look at these firms' participation in other on-line communities (you can see Norton Rose's here).

It's also worth comparing the participation of Australian firms with those in the US and UK. But it's Saturday and we all have better things to do. But US author Adrian Dayton (@adriandayton) was in Australia and met with many of the large firms in March.

Why is this relevant?

It's stating the obvious to say that businesses' participation in social media will require input from their legal advisors. I'd argue that advice is more valuable if it's based on practical experience.

But, this is Web 2.0, you be the judge.

Update: http://www.thenewlawyer.com.au/law-firms/firms-ranked-on-social-media-use

3 comments:

Australia Japan Law said...

I've just linked to this article with a Japanese translation of the title.

Japan has really embraced twitter, and while I'm not aware of any large firms tweeting, there's a small, but growing band of lawyers engaging social media.

Australia Japan Law
t: @ausjapanlaw

Paul said...

Our firm should be included in the list. We only have 10 lawyers but we nearly all tweet, and have different followers for different lawyers. We're not just a corporation with a twitter profile - we are 10 lawyers with our own interests and legal links in our tweets - even to other law firm articles (if they're good): www.hnlaw.com.au

Paul said...

Thanks for the comment Paul. It wasn't intended to be an exhaustive list of all law firms on Twitter, just the ten largest in Australia. But nice to hear from you.